Forum:Answers to Thoth's arguments at anamericanatheist?

Hi,

I'm wondering if anyone are is willing to address Thoth argument's which I've found at http://anamericanatheist.org/2011/02/07/2011/:
 * Dear Mr. Langan,


 * Artificial intelligence in the image of humans will disprove the CTMU’s conclusion and assumed premises. That being one cannot prove whether God exists, doesn’t or does AND doesn’t.


 * This is not to say that the CTMU is within itself illogical. The body is sound. The problem mainly lies within the idea of God in the first place and that we are special, wherein if God had a mind and thus created our universe, it is only logical to say that we are in the mind of god and thus anything within is a discernible piece of God. And therefore, our logic exists outside our universe.


 * This would be proven if we could step outside this reality and enter the (x)-ality and find the “Grand Designer”.


 * One cannot make the leap to say, because I understand what’s inside (humans and the universe), I understand what’s alternatively conclusive (what’s outside an infinite space).


 * I don’t understand why Chris Langan makes this claim.


 * Using this logic makes it just as logical to say that because I understand what’s inside our universe and it’s intelligence means that God doesn’t exist because God wouldn’t have a mind.


 * Chris Lagan’s image of God is based on the original idea of what God would be if he existed.


 * Science finishes what philosophy starts. Circular reasoning which the CTMU as a whole is is the reason it’s never going to be accepted by the scientific community. Ever.


 * 1. God is what created us, in which has a mind and is outside our universe.


 * 2. How do we know?


 * 3. CTMU


 * 4. Why believe the CTMU?


 * 5. Because it’s absolute certainty!


 * 6. How do we know that it’s absolute certainty?


 * 7. Because God is our creator. He exists and has a mind.


 * Sorry Mr. Langan, I do actually like you very much and feel sorry for how your life turned out. The CTMU is only useful for what many consider computerized intelligence.


 * It is not illogical to be an atheist, religious fanatic or an agnostic. The important part is the path we take on how we come to the conclusion and how they affect our actions thereafter.


 * The absolute truth is that there is no absolute truth.


 * Sincerely,


 * Thoth


 * -Leader of the Illuminati and New World Order

Thanks